Michael J. Saks is Regents Professor at the Arizona State University where he is on the faculties of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and the Department of Psychology. He is the past co-editor of Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony. Barbara A. Spellman is Professor of Law (and former Professor of Psychology) at the University of Virginia. She is the former editor of Perspectives on Psychological Science.
In this book, two of the worlds most knowledgeable experts on
psychology and law show that the legal rules of evidence are based
largely on conjectures about how people think about evidence. Saks
and Spellman persuasively demonstrate that some of those
conjectures are well-founded, some not, and some are completely at
odds with the scientific literature. Who knew?
*Jonathan J. Koehler,Beatrice Kuhn Professor of Law, Northwestern
University School of Law*
Michael J. Saks and Barbara A. Spellman have succeeded brilliantly
in doing what too few have attempted and many fewer still have
accomplished. This book casts a bright light onto the dusty
suppositions of evidence doctrine and employs contemporary
psychological science to take the measure of the modern rules.
Elegantly written and comprehensive in scope, Saks and Spellmans
work establishes a new standard for interdisciplinary
scholarship.
*David L. Faigman,John F. Digardi Distinguished Professor of Law,
University of California, Hastings*
Anyone seeking a treasure trove of new ideas will come away
motivated, as the authors admirably achieve their noble goal of
bringing attention to the need for more psychological research
related to the Rules.
*PsycCRITIQUES*
Ask a Question About this Product More... |