1. Introduction; 2. 'A legitimate shadow'; 3. Deciding to decide; 4. Warning signs; 5. 'The major project'; 6. 'Hare-brained'; 7. Taking stock; 8. WESERÜBUNG; 9. 'Something must be done'; 10. The jigsaw puzzle; 11. 'Something must be done'; 12. 'Boldness is required'; 13. 'An even greater prize'; 14. Maurice; 15. Sickle; 16. 'We must get out'; 17. The third dimension; 18. 'In the name of God, go!'; 19. 'A good dividend'; 20. 'No time to lose'; 21. The long retreat; 22. Finale; 23. Conclusions.
Senior military commander assesses the reasons behind the ignominious failure of the British campaign in Norway in 1940.
John Kiszely served in the British Army for forty years, rising to the rank of lieutenant general. His operational service included Northern Ireland, the Falkland Islands, Bosnia and Iraq. He served three tours of duty in the Ministry of Defence, latterly as Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff. On leaving the Army he spent three years as a visiting professor in war studies at King's College London, and from 2014 to 2017 was a visiting research fellow on the Changing Character of War Programme at Pembroke College, Oxford.
'Kiszely's work is a model of how to analyse the political,
strategic and operational dimensions of such a campaign. As such,
it provides a great deal to ponder on the nature of war and
decision-making. In an era when the UK seems to have abandoned the
attempt to produce official history and analyses of past campaigns,
Kiszely's work demonstrates the value of assessing the key failures
and lessons of military campaigns.' Niall Barr, RUSI Journal
'For those who are really interested in the study of war and the
interrelationship between strategy, operations, and tactics,
General Kiszely has written an extraordinarily important book. If
military leaders fail to take the study of their profession
seriously, they will inevitably find themselves incapable of
connecting means to ends. Nor will they be able to provide sensible
advice to politicians who have no background in military affairs or
who, as occurred in Iraq in 2003, are willfully ignorant. Moreover,
perhaps most disastrously, generals who have not taken the trouble
to study their potential opponents will not understand the other
side of the hill and, on the basis of the most facile assumptions,
will send their troops into combat unprepared to deal with a
living, adapting opponent.' Williamson Murray, Joint Force
Quarterly
'Kiszely's volume (already recipient of the Duke of Westminster
Gold Medal for best military writing from the [Royal United
Services Institute]) reflects its author. Methodical, precise and
reflective of the planning and organisational training of a
professional British Army officer and cites Clausewitz. … Clearly
written and expressed, this is one of the best narratives on the
subject available.' The Society of Friends of the National Army
Museum Book Review Supplement
'The book is written in an engaging style, and short biographical
sketches bring to life the major participants. The maps are
excellent and an appendix with a useful timeline helps orient the
reader … The book is recommended for readers interested in World
War II and especially for students at professional military
education institutions.' Corbin Williamson, H-War
|
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
