Preface * Towards a long-term European strategy on climate change policy * Long-term goals and post-2012 commitments: where do we go from here with climate policy? * Between the USA and the South: strategic choices for European climate policy * The role of technological development and policies in a post-Kyoto climactic regime * Post-Kyoto climate policy targets: costs and competitiveness implications * Post-2012 climate action in the broad framework of sustainable development policies: the role of the EU * The EU and future climate policy: is mainstreaming adaptation a distraction or part of the solution? * Towards climate policy integration in the EU: evolving dilemmas and opportunities * Rationalities for adaptation in EU climate change policies *
Bert Metz leads the Global Environmental Assessment Division at RIVM, the National Institute for Public Health & the Environment, the Netherlands. He is also co-chairman of IPCC Working Group III (climate change mitigation). Mike Hulme is Exec Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, UK. Editor-in-chief of Climate Policy is Michael Grubb, Visiting Professor at Imperial College London and Associated Director of Policy at the Carbon Trust, UK
"More than 50 mostly European individuals participated in two successive workshops designed to recommend policies that Europe might use to bolster European and global sustainability while examining the views of other post-2012 negotiators. Drawn from agencies, NGOs, industries, and the scientific community, eight authors revised and submitted their post-2012 and longer-term goals. The critical role of developing countries in climate change control rises from their expected exponential increase in greenhouse gas emissions over the next few decades in combination with their limited resources to adapt. A synergistic adaptive capacity framework is proposed to link climate change adaptation and poverty reduction into national priorities. Although the European Commission provided the original funding to provide a coherent European voice for climate control options beyond 2012, the dismal consensus seems to accept that the following decades will include serious climate change impacts. The identification and promotion of innovative synergies combined with a continuation of strict emission controls combined with adaptation may be the only reasonable alternative. Focusing on collaboration that enhances a transition to sustainable development in concert with developing countries may be the fairest and most effective direction. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through professionals."--R. M. Ferguson, Eastern Connecticut State University in CHOICE
|
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
