Carrying Out a Systematic Review as a Master's Thesis - Rumona Dickson, M. Gemma Cherry and Angela Boland Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion Criteria - M. Gemma Cherry and Rumona Dickson Developing My Search Strategy and Applying Inclusion Criteria - Yenal Dundar and Nigel Fleeman Quality Assessment: Where Do I Begin? - Janette Greenhalgh and Tamara Brown Data Extraction: Where Do I Begin? - Nigel Fleeman and Yenal Dundar Understanding and Synthesizing My Numerical Data - Michaela Blundell Writing My Discussion and Conclusions - M. Gemma Cherry Reviewing Qualitative Evidence - M. Gemma Cherry, Elizabeth Perkins, Rumona Dickson and Angela Boland Systematically Reviewing Economic Evaluations - Angela Boland, Sophie Beale and M. Gemma Cherry Planning and Managing My Review - Gerlinde Pilkington and Juliet Hockenhull
Angela Boland has worked at LRiG (Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group) since it was established in 2001 and has carried out many systematic reviews of both clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of health care interventions. Gemma Cherry is Lecturer is Clinical Health Psychology at the University of Liverpool. Prior to training, she worked at LRiG for several years conducting systematic reviews. Rumona Dickson has been involved in the conduct of systematic reviews in health care for over 20 years and has been the Director of LRiG since 2001.
My bookshelves are already laden with "How to do it" books on
systematic reviews - very few of these are readable, informative
and useful. But what do I do when I need to inform tomorrow's
supervision meeting? Quite simply - I reach for this book!
-- Andrew Booth
The systematic review is frequently the pathway to the Master's degree for many students, and often key to the development of a good research question. Students often find the systematic critical review and synthesis of research relevant to their research question daunting. This text provides a clear roadmap for those engaging in the process. The text provides step-by-step guidance through the systematic review, providing strategies for success, with tables and process descriptions that are extremely useful. Chapters align with the steps in the process and address each component of the review with clarity and multiple examples. While other texts may provide a broad overview of the process, strengths of the current text include its attention to detail, its practical approach to situations that may occur in the process, and its inclusion of responses to questions frequently asked by students. This text fills a gap with a much-needed reference for students and professionals for whom research evaluation is integral to success.-- Susan S. Levy