Contents; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; List of maps; Introduction; Part I. Inevitable Descent into the Abyss?: The Wider Pre-History of the Great War. The Involution of International Politics at the Dawn of the “Long” 20th Century: 1. Peace through equilibrium. The 19th century's Vienna system – and its disintegration; 2. Transformation and corrosion. The turn towards power politics and global imperialist competition in the formative decades of the “long” 20th century; 3. The “ascent” of an exceptionalist world power. The American special path and ephemeral aspirations for an Atlantic order of empires; 4. Counterforces – and first visions of a novel transatlantic peace. Internationalist aspirations to overcome imperialist power politics before 1914; 5. The unavoidable war? Long and short roads to the catastrophe of 1914; Part II. The Greatest War – and No Peace Without Victory: The Impact of the First World War, Competing Visions of Peace and the Struggle over the Shape of a New – Atlantic – World Order: 6. Tectonic changes. The consequences of the war and the transformation of the transatlantic constellation; 7. The political and ideological “war within the war”. The transatlantic competition over the shape of the postwar order; 8. No “peace without victory” – and the making of the frail Atlantic armistice of November 1918; 9. No prospects for a lasting peace? The urgent and the systemic challenges of peacemaking and the need for a new Atlantic order; Part III. Reorientations and Incipient Learning Processes: The Dominant – Atlantic – Approaches to Peace and Order after the Great War: 10. Towards a progressive Atlantic peace of the victors. The reorientation of American approaches to peace and international order; 11. The search for a new equilibrium – and an Atlantic concert. The reorientation of British approaches to peace and international order; 12. The search for security and an Atlantic alliance of the victors. The reorientation of French approaches to peace and international order; 13. A new beginning? German pursuits of a Wilsonian “peace of justice” and first steps towards an Atlanticist foreign policy; Part IV. No “Pax Atlantica”: The First Attempt to Found a Modern Atlantic Order – and its Frustration: 14. An impossible peace? The incomplete transatlantic peacemaking process of 1919; 15. Novel superstructure of a new Atlantic order? The struggle to found the League of Nations and the limitations of the covenant of 1919; 16. No just peace without security. The pivotal German settlement and the struggle to found a new Atlantic security system; 17. The eastern frontiers – and limits – of the new order. Self-determination, the critical Polish-German question and the wider challenges of “reorganising” Eastern Europe; 18. A formative threat? The Western powers and the Bolshevik challenge; 19. The political and moral stakes of reparations – and the limited advances towards a new Atlantic economic order; 20. The imposed peace. The missed opportunity of a negotiated settlement with Germany?; 21. The truncated Atlantic peace order of 1919 – a re-appraisal; Part V. Epilogue: The Political Consequences of the Peace: The Challenges after Versailles and the Making of the Unfinished Atlantic Peace of the 1920s: 22. Peace undermined. The divergent outlooks of the victors, the consequences of Wilson's defeat and the escalation of Europe's postwar crisis; 23. Towards a new order. Constructive learning processes and the construction of an Atlantic peace beyond Versailles; 24. The remarkable consolidation of the nascent Pax Atlantica of the 1920s – and its dissolution under the impact of the world economic crisis; Part VI. Final Perspectives – the Cadmeian Peace: 25. The eventual creation of the “long” 20th century's Atlantic order after 1945 and the crucial lessons of the era of the First World War; Bibliography.
Sheds new light on a transformation process: the struggle to create a modern Atlantic order in the long twentieth century.
Patrick O. Cohrs is Professor of International History at the University of Florence. He was associate professor of history at Yale University, a fellow at Harvard University, and Alistair Horne Fellow at St Antony's College, Oxford. He is the author of the acclaimed The Unfinished Peace after World War I (Cambridge, 2006).
'In this opus magnum Patrick Cohrs presents an original and
thought-provoking re-appraisal of the transformation of world
politics between the era of global imperialism and the aftermath of
the First World War. This is a compelling book that should be of
interest to anyone who wants to understand how challenging it was
to create a stable international order after the 20th century's
crucial cataclysm, how the key actors struggled to build a durable
peace, and how the consequences of what they thought and did still
shape the world of the 21st century.' Paul W. Schroeder, author of
The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848
'This ground-breaking work offers a challenging and original
interpretation of how and why the international order was
transformed at the dawn of a "long" twentieth century. What drove
these changes was a struggle, involving an unprecedented number of
transnational actors and ideas, to forge rules, norms and
institutions of a new Atlantic order among democratic states. The
system-building efforts of the post-World War I era were to
resonate throughout the entire century.' Jürgen Osterhammel, author
of The Transformation of the World
'An important book that recasts debates about European and global
disorder after the First World War in a longer history of Atlantic
world-order making since 1860. Advancing the case that the Paris
Peace Conference produced an international 'system' that sought to
address the question of German power and its place in the world,
this new history also offers insights for contemporary debates on
the question of China and the prospects for regional and global
order in the present disorderly context of the 21st Century.'
Patricia Clavin, author of Securing the World Economy: The
Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946
'Patrick Cohrs's new grand narrative reappraises great-power
relations from the late nineteenth century across World War I and
the postwar treaties to argue that durably bringing peace to Europe
would ultimately require an “Atlantic” system that both reconciled
Germany and durably engaged the United States. The reader will find
a major reassessment of the peace that might have been and a
challenging diagnosis of what sadly prevented it.' Charles S.
Maier, author of Among Empires - American Ascendancy and Its
Predecessors
'This is a work of international history par excellence. Patrick
Cohrs ambitiously merges an in-depth analysis of international
politics with structuralist methods to capture the transformation
of global order between 1860 and 1933. The New Atlantic Order
offers a convincing structuralist approach to the coming of the
Great War, showing that European leaders certainly did not
sleepwalk into the abyss. The book's reappraisal of 1914–1918
diplomacy and the Paris Peace Conference, which draws on a massive
array of new archival sources, is particularly strong, indeed
admirable. Here is an international historian bringing the fruits
of his work.' Paul M. Kennedy, author of The Rise and Fall of the
Great Powers
'This magisterial work focuses on the failure to prevent World War
II. Cohrs advances [the] argument … [that] any European order
[after World War I] based solely on military containment was doomed
unless it addressed the deeper sources of all European conflicts
from 1850 to the present: diverging claims of national
self-determination, opposing economic and financial interests, and
intense ideological strife between the political right, left, and
center. [The book's] sweeping synthesis and grounding in primary
sources makes an impressive thousand-page read.' Andrew Moravcsik,
Foreign Affairs
'The New Atlantic Order is an enormous achievement … not just in
terms of its sweeping narrative and impressive primary-source base,
but also in terms of its innumerable historiographical
interventions … (It) … grounds its argument about a
transformational 'long twentieth century' in a deeper history
stretching back to 1860 and extending to 2020 … Cohrs argues that a
cohesive 160-year period, … with 1914–1933 as a critical yet
incomplete turning point, transformed international order around a
Pax Atlantica system, and that this order is now coming to an end.'
Andrew Preston, H-Diplo Roundtable
'The goal of [Cohrs'] impressive erudition is … to reconceptualize
the entire process of peacemaking [after the First World War] … He
sees [it] within three broader contexts, located in temporally ever
larger concentric circles. The smallest … involves understanding
peacemaking as an attempt to create a 'new Atlantic order', a
transatlantic security and economic architecture linking the United
States with western and central Europe … [that anticipated] the
more successful transatlantic creations after 1945. Surrounding
this circle is the broader notion of a 'long twentieth century',
running from 1860 to 2020 … The widest circle is a consideration of
… international relations from the Congress of Vienna until the
present, emphasizing the idea of … a system of co-operation among
sovereign states … under the supervision of a power or powers that
act as benevolent hegemons. This combination of detailed empirical
research and large-scale reconceptualization creates a complex
structure with lots of moving parts, impressive to observe in
action …' Jonathan Sperber, Times Literary Supplement
'Cohrs goes much further than before (in his new interpretation of
the transformation of world order in the long 20th century) … He
strongly focuses on the peace settlement after the First World War
and here highlights his leitmotif of a new transatlantic order. Yet
his approach is always directed at the international order as a
whole … (Cohrs argues that) the pre-war era and the Great War would
have required a radical transformation of the international system
… based on international law and liberal-progressive foundations,
reinforced through transnational democratisation processes and
pivoted on the League of Nations … A significant scholarly
achievement sui generis … (Cohrs' new book is) all in all an
admirably tight and comprehensive study.' Jost Dülffer, Historische
Zeitschrift
'Patrick Cohrs, a leading historian of international relations … is
… avowedly interested in how principles were applied and
institutions developed after the First World War. Yet he also seeks
to understand historical complexity and the interplay of power,
principle, institutions, and personal ambition. Cohrs … makes a
wider argument that modern peace-making following major wars
requires the constructive integration of defeated powers.
Integration legitimized the making of international order after
other systemic wars-the Napoleonic Wars and the Second World War.
This integrating process, however, took place... over several years
after the end of major war. (He) shows compellingly that by the
mid-1920s, the Weimar Republic was integrated into regular,
multilateral international negotiations, so that, in this respect
at least, peace-making after the First World War looks more akin to
other major settlements…' William Mulligan, Society
'Patrick Cohrs has offered … a highly readable and carefully
crafted tome, which elaborates upon the oft-told story of the Paris
peace negotiations and agreements in 1919 and places them within
(a) much broader historical context … One of the great strengths of
this volume is the way in which Cohrs has transcended the
traditional caesuras of war and revolution to create his own
periodization … (He also) goes beyond the traditional diplomatic
players of government ministries and leaders to incorporate other
voices of civil society, such as non-governmental domestic and
internationalist social movements …' Jennifer Siegel, H-Diplo
Roundtable
'Arguing that the Paris Peace Conference was a nascent attempt to
expand the focus of the international order beyond Europe, Cohrs
makes the case in his new book that this was the dawn of a
transatlantic order … this is a monumental piece of work … Cohrs'
rich empirical work is fantastic, and his interpretation of how
conceptions of international order shifted in the early twentieth
century is insightful. For students of history and international
order, this will prove invaluable.' Patrick Gill-Tiney,
International Studies Review
'… an enormous achievement … not just in terms of its sweeping
narrative and impressive primary-source base, but also in terms of
its innumerable historiographical interventions…' Andrew Preston,
H-Diplo Roundtable
'… a highly readable and carefully crafted tome … This book is
based on masterly archival work ... Cohrs goes beyond the
traditional diplomatic players of government ministries and leaders
to incorporate other voices of civil society, such as
non-governmental domestic and internationalist social movements…'
Jennifer Siegel, H-Diplo Roundtable
'… a feat of intellectual investigation…' P. Sean Morris,
International Affairs
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |