Reviews

It would be a lot more fun to debate this book than to review it. Robbins's (English, Rutgers) purview, the professionalization of intellectuals, is worth study; his contention that this phenomenon is fortuitous might raise hackles (or engender paradigmatically progressive discourse?). He writes: ``Although the profession does constitute an elite, it is also socially responsive, socially representative . . . . In vulgar sociological terms, professionalism's necessary claim to public service can thus be satisfied.'' This book is a challenging, if jargon-laden, vessel, full of capsulelike summaries of ``thinkers'' like Said, Jameson, and Foucault that will be redundant to the initiated. One wonders (crass reactionary negativity?) if this book will be read by the anarchist, antiacademic, middlebrow uninitiated? Maybe (note the price) in large academic libraries?-- Robert E. Brown, Onondaga Cty. P.L., Syracuse, N.Y.

Robbins, professor of English at Rutgers, here offers an original defense of academic cultural criticism as practiced today. Whereas most commentators have lamented the professionalization and increasing specialization of cultural work, Robbins contends that such ``fall narratives'' oversimplify, and that university-based intellectuals can contribute valuable critical insight and political awareness to a likewise professionalized public. Seeking to expose the inconsistencies of theory's critics, Robbins deconstructs their appeals to abstract notions of culture, critical distance, universality and the public. Alongside of this negative work, Robbins presents positive accounts of the careers of significant literary intellectuals, whose writings he mines for ``allegories of vocation'' that provide possible models for socially engaged academics. He focuses here on the late British Marxist Raymond Williams and on Edward Said, author of Orientalism . Robbins writes at a high pitch of theoretical sophistication, but cogently; his arguments will provide a valuable counterweight in the ongoing battles over the value of contemporary criticism. (Aug.)