PART I ARGUMENT CHAPTER 1 LESSONS FROM THE FRONTIERS OF FAILURE Conflict Resolution and Second Order Social Learning CHAPTER 2 CONFLICT RESOLUTON AND ITS ENEMIES The World in 2015: Trends in global violence CHAPTER 3 WHY CONFLICT RESOLUTION FAILS Linguistic intractability and radical disagreement CHAPTER 4 AN ALTERNATIVE TO NEGOTIATION AND DIALOGUE Engaging radical disagreement in intractable conflict PART II CASE STUDY CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC THINKING FOR POSSESSORS Why should Israel give up anything? CHAPTER 6 STRATEGIC THINKING FOR CHALLENGERS How can Palestinians transform the status quo? CHAPTER 7 STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT The Israeli Strategic Forum, the Palestine Strategy Group, and the Palestinian Citizens Of Israel Group CHAPTER 8 STRATEGIC THINKING FOR THIRD PARTIES Principled Negotiation, Strategic Negotiation and the Kerry Initiative PART III IMPLICATIONS CHAPTER 9 EXTENDED CONFLICT RESOLUTION Other phases, other levels, other conflicts CHAPTER 10 EXPLORING RADICAL DISAGREEMENT Taking agonistic dialogue seriously CHAPTER 11 UNDERSTANDING RADICAL DISAGREEMENT Is there a theory of radical disagreement? CHAPTER 12 LIVING WITH RADICAL DISAGREEMENT Facing an agonistic future
Oliver Ramsbotham is Emeritus Professor of Conflict Resolution at the University of Bradford and President of the Conflict Research Society. He is co-author of the bestselling and hugely popular survey of the field Contemporary Conflict Resolution, now in its fourth edition.
'This well-informed and nuanced analysis offers one of the most incisive treatments of the Israel/Palestine conflict available. Among books in the field, there is really nothing quite like it.' Alan Dowty, University of Notre Dame 'When Conflict Resolution Fails extends Ramsbotham's groundbreaking work on "radical disagreement". Using the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as its main case, it describes a form of "extended conflict resolution", built around ideas and practices of "strategic engagement", that challenges our understanding of the role of third parties and proposes what may be, ethically, the outer limits of conflict resolution itself. An important and necessarily sobering book.' Kevin Avruch, George Mason University